Question:"It is generally not the belief of the Jews that there is any afterlife. There is nothing to support such a belief in the Torah. Not till the prophet Ezekiel do you find the valley of bones. The Sadducees did not believe in an afterlife, for instance." Answer:Scripture presents a progressive revelation of truth. Not everything is taught in its completeness in the Torah. To say that the Sadducees (who accepted only the Torah and rejected the later books) did not believe in an afterlife may be akin to saying that those who do not accept the fullness of God's revelation reject the fullness of God's revelation. But, let's be more precise. What specific "afterlife" do you claim that the Sadducees rejected? Is it (1) the existence of the soul, (2) the conscious existence of the soul separated from the body after death, or (3) the rejoining of the soul with some type of body in the resurrection? Bakers Dictionary of Theology describes the Sadducees: "They regarded the law (written Scripture) as binding, but rejected the scribal tradition and held the prophets less authoritative. They disliked innovation, hence rejected: a) the Persian concept of two hierarchies of good and evil spirits (Acts 23:8); b) the resurrection of the body (cf. Luke 20:27-33, where they argued that the Law of levirate marriage disproved it, but were shown from the law that God assumes the continued existence of the patriarchs and that the resurrected are as angels), though Josephus may exaggerate when he says that they denied even the immortality of the soul (Ant. 18.1.4); c) rewards and punishments in Hades." To be fair, here is Josephus' description of the beliefs of the Sadducees in "Antiquities of the Jews," XVIII:1.4 "But the doctrine of the Sadducees is this: That souls die with the bodies; nor do they regard the observation of anything besides what the law enjoins them; for they think it an instance of virtue to dispute with those teachers of philosophy whom they frequent; but this doctrine is received but by a few, yet by those still of greatest dignity; but they are able to do almost nothing of themselves; for when they become magistrates, as they are unwillingly and by force sometimes obliged to be, they addict themselves to the notions of the Pharisees, because the multitude would not otherwise bear them." R. Dean Peterson's "A Concise History of Christianity" describes the Sadducees: "The Sadducees were a small but wealthy ruling party closely associated with the temple and Jerusalem. They controlled the important office of the high priest and had great political influence in the Sanhedrin (the Jewish ruling body). "They taught a strict observance of the Torah as 'it was given to Moses' and would permit no new doctrines apart from those found in the original Torah. As a result, they rejected oral interpretations of the Torah along with new ideas about life after death, the resurrection of the body, and angels and spirits. They tended to accept older interpretations of the afterlife found in the Torah. To them, life after death consisted of semilifeless ghosts confined to the gray underworld known as sheol." At best, it seems a matter of conjecture whether the Sadducees rejected the existence of the soul after death. All agree they rejected the resurrection. The claim that the Jews in general rejected an "afterlife" clearly goes against historical understanding of the orthodox view. In the resurrection, the soul would be reunited with the body. This was the major point of discord between the Pharisees and the Sadducees. A story from the Talmud illustrates: "Once when Hillel left his disciples, they said to him, 'Whither are you going?' He replied, 'To do a kindness to a guest in the house.' They said, 'Have you every day a guest?' He said, 'Yes, is not the soul a guest in the body? To-day it is here, to-morrow it is gone.'" (Lev.R., Behar, XXXIV, 3) A. Cohen in "Everyman's Talmud" describes this controversy between the Sadducees and the Rabbis as follows: "No aspect of the subject of the Hereafter has so important a place in the religious teaching of the Rabbis as the doctrine of the Resurrection. It became with them an article of faith the denial of which was considered as sinful; and they declared: 'Since a person repudiated belief in the Resurrection of the dead, he will have no share in the Resurrection' (Sah. 90a). "The prominence which this dogma assumed was the effect of religious controversy. It was one of the differences between the Pharisees and Sadducees. The latter, as we know from other sources [here referencing Josephus], taught that the soul became extinct when the body died and death was the final end of the human being. This denial of a Hereafter involved the doctrine of reward and punishment to which the Pharisees attached great importance, and for that reason they fought it strenuously. They made it the theme one of the Eighteen Benedictions which formed part of the daily services of prayer: 'Thou sustainest the living with lovingkindness, revivest the dead with great mercy, supportest the falling, healest the sick, looses the bound, and keepest Thy faith to them that sleep in the dust. Who is like unto Thee, Lord of mightly acts, and who resembles Thee, O King, who killest and revivest, and causest salvation to spring forth? Yea, faithful art Thou to revive the dead. Blessed art Thou, O Lord, Who revivest the dead.'" Montefiore and Loewe in "A Rabbinic Anthology" describe daily "test" prayers recited in the synagogue. One of these tests was "Blessed is He who quickens the dead." They then comment about this: "The synagogue being free, and it being open to anyone to lead in prayer, there was a danger that heretical prayers might be recited by a reader who held heretical views. His reluctance to recite one of the 'tests' preserved the orthodoxy of the pulpit. A Sadducee would be deterred by having to proclaim that 'God quickens the dead' and a Samaritian would hesitate to pray for Jerusalem." To claim that the Jewish majority view rejected the existence of the soul after the death of the body and rejected the resurrection would not be correct. In fact, the Sadducees were a relatively small sect. They are mentioned by Josephus along with the Pharisees and Essenes under Jonathan, 146 BC; and because their beliefs were so closely connected to the Temple, they died out quickly after the its destruction. They were an influence, or a minor irritant, for a relatively short time in the history of Israel. I have already cited several Scriptures in the Torah that reference the soul and the prohibitions against attempting contact with departed souls. The groundwork for continued revelation about the nature of man was clearly laid down in the Torah. Consciousness and brain function Return to the Table of Contents |